<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SoccerShout &#187; arsenal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://soccershout.com/category/arsenal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://soccershout.com</link>
	<description>A blog about football...mostly Premier League and English football</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:50:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Arsenal&#8217;s Dismantling of Porto</title>
		<link>http://soccershout.com/2010/03/09/arsenals-dismantling-of-porto/</link>
		<comments>http://soccershout.com/2010/03/09/arsenals-dismantling-of-porto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[arsenal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccershout.com/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brilliant stuff from Arsenal, who scored a goal for every technical mistake made by the referee for that goal.
I just got round to watching the highlights of the way they took Burnley apart on Saturday &#8211; breathtaking.
Match report from GoonerTalk here.
If Arsenal go on to win the Premier League and Champions League, you&#8217;ll find no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant stuff from Arsenal, who <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/european/porto-referee-was-a-joke-says-wenger-1905032.html" target="_blank">scored a goal for every technical mistake</a> made by the referee for <em>that </em>goal.</p>
<p>I just got round to watching the highlights of the way they took Burnley apart on Saturday &#8211; breathtaking.</p>
<p>Match report from GoonerTalk <a href="http://goonertalk.com/2010/03/09/match-report-arsenal-5-0-fc-porto/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>If Arsenal go on to win the Premier League and Champions League, you&#8217;ll find no complaints from me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://soccershout.com/2010/03/09/arsenals-dismantling-of-porto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Waddle on Theo Walcott</title>
		<link>http://soccershout.com/2010/03/08/chris-waddle-on-theo-walcott/</link>
		<comments>http://soccershout.com/2010/03/08/chris-waddle-on-theo-walcott/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[arsenal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris waddle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theo walcott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccershout.com/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harsh words from Chris Waddle in the Daily Mail:
I have watched Walcott for a number of years and there are no doubts he has strengths to his game. Well, he has one strength in particular: his terrific pace.
But why does he not use it more? Why does he not get more of the ball? You [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harsh words from <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/worldcup2010/article-1256494/WORLD-CUP-2010-EXCLUSIVE--Leaving-Theo-Walcott-home-It-s-brainer-claims-ex-England-winger-Chris-Waddle.html?ITO=1490" target="_blank">Chris Waddle in the Daily Mail</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>I have watched Walcott for a number of years and there are no doubts he has strengths to his game. Well, he has one strength in particular: his terrific pace.</p>
<p>But why does he not use it more? Why does he not get more of the ball? You can only look at his movement and conclude it is not good enough.</p>
<p>He proved he can cross and deliver a ball against Burnley at the weekend. But why does he not do that consistently? I stand by my assessment that he doesn&#8217;t yet have a football brain.</p></blockquote>
<p>My personal feeling is that Walcott hasn&#8217;t had the time to develop fully.  He lost a lot of games by moving to Arsenal when he should have been getting another 50 or 100 games under his belt at Southampton.  It&#8217;s amazing to think that he only made 21 appearances for the Saints.</p>
<p>Since then &#8211; four years and two months &#8211; he&#8217;s only started 38 games for the Gunners (less than a single Football League season).  Waddle goes on to call Wenger &#8220;one of the best teachers in the world&#8221;, but I can&#8217;t see how Walcott is going to develop if he doesn&#8217;t play many games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://soccershout.com/2010/03/08/chris-waddle-on-theo-walcott/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quality vs Excitement</title>
		<link>http://soccershout.com/2010/03/07/quality-vs-excitement/</link>
		<comments>http://soccershout.com/2010/03/07/quality-vs-excitement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[arsenal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chelsea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[man utd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccershout.com/2010/03/07/quality-vs-excitement/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This season&#8217;s Premier League is turning out to be the most exciting for a long, long time. It&#8217;s also the lowest quality display, among the front-runners, that I can remember.
Arsenal were inconsistent pushovers for the first few months. You can&#8217;t say Man Utd are strong in either attack, midfield, or defence. Chelsea looked invincible for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This season&#8217;s Premier League is turning out to be the most exciting for a long, long time. It&#8217;s also the lowest quality display, among the front-runners, that I can remember.</p>
<p>Arsenal were inconsistent pushovers for the first few months. You can&#8217;t say Man Utd are strong in either attack, midfield, or defence. Chelsea looked invincible for a good while but have been stuck in second gear since Christmas.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8211; relatively-speaking they&#8217;re better than the rest and deserve to be at the top. But you get the feeling that the league-winning side from any of the past 10 years would wipe the floor with this lot.</p>
<p>And yet&#8230;this season has been a real vintage. I&#8217;ve watched more games than I have for ages, as anyone can beat anyone.</p>
<p>Will the Premier League&#8217;s administrators learn anything from this. Say, that a closer level of team ability leads to better entgertainment?  I shan&#8217;t be holding my breath.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re more likely to claim that their hands-off policy of letting market-force dictate is working. But that isn&#8217;t what is going on here. The rich teams are just having a bad year. Next year one of them will get their act together and win the league by 15 points and only lose once in the process.</p>
<p>But I won&#8217;t be watching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://soccershout.com/2010/03/07/quality-vs-excitement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
